0.02/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 960 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:07:19 EDT 2022 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.42 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 120s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_2 with 120s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # sh5l with pid 23262 completed with status 0 0.15/0.42 # Result found by sh5l 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.15/0.42 # ...ProofStateSinE()=3/5 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-MHSFFSBC 0.15/0.42 # partial match(3): HHUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 23267 completed with status 0 0.15/0.42 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSCHSA. 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.15/0.42 # ...ProofStateSinE()=3/5 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-MHSFFSBC 0.15/0.42 # partial match(3): HHUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.15/0.42 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 73s (1) cores 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # Proof found! 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_22, type, eps: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_23, type, epscomp: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_24, type, epred1_0: $i > $o). 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.15/0.42 thf(epscompd, axiom, ((epscomp)=(^[X1:$i > $o]:(eps @ (^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', epscompd)). 0.15/0.42 thf(choicecomp, conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:((?[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2)))=>~((X1 @ (epscomp @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', choicecomp)). 0.15/0.42 thf(choiceax, axiom, ![X1:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ (eps @ X1))<=?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', choiceax)). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_3, plain, ((epscomp)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(eps @ (^[Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[epscompd])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:((?[X2:$i]:(~(X1 @ X2))=>~(X1 @ (eps @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~((X1 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[choicecomp]), c_0_3])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1:$i > $o]:((?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2))=>(X1 @ (eps @ X1)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[choiceax])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&(epred1_0 @ (eps @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~((epred1_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X9:$i > $o, X10:$i]:((~(X9 @ X10)|(X9 @ (eps @ X9)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (eps @ (^[Z0:$i]:(~((epred1_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (eps @ X1))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((epred1_0 @ X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_8])])). 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.42 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 3 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 7 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 7 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 5 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 2 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 4 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 5 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 7 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 363 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages 0.15/0.42 0.15/0.42 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.005 s 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages 0.15/0.42 EOF